Inner West Side apartments — scored on safety and upkeep
Inner West Side renters have a mix of established, budget-friendly complexes and newer renovated communities to choose from. This ranking pulls from resident reviews to compare how each property actually performs on maintenance turnaround, staff responsiveness, and safety, not just star ratings. Full details behind each score are explained in our methodology.
Many of these communities are family-oriented with pools and playgrounds, and several residents mention long tenures and lease renewals as a sign of stability. That said, pest control, security, and office responsiveness vary a lot between properties, so it's worth asking pointed questions during a tour rather than relying on the exterior or amenities alone.
35 businesses, scored on rating, review volume, recency, sentiment and listing completeness. How we score › · View on map ›
At a glance
| # | Business | Score | Rating | From | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Regency Grove Apartments | 75 | 3.9 (277) | — | affordable housing |
| 2 | Las Villas De Leon Apartments | 72 | 4.4 (174) | — | Families and pet owners |
| 3 | Bexar Creek Apartments | 70 | 4.4 (97) | — | Long-term, budget-conscious tenants |
| 4 | Mira Vista Ranch Apartment Homes | 70 | 3.9 (158) | — | Renters who vet staff reputations first |
| 5 | The Sorento Apartments | 68 | 4.1 (158) | — | Seniors, renovated units |
| 6 | Loma Vista Lofts | 68 | 4.5 (53) | — | First-time renters on a budget |
| 7 | The Gobi Apartments | 67 | 4.2 (114) | — | Renters needing service-animal accommodation |
| 8 | Cabana Apartments | 66 | 4.2 (41) | — | furnished corporate |
| 9 | Vivid Apartments | 65 | 4.1 (117) | — | First-time renters, dog owners |
| 10 | Legacy at Science Park | 65 | 4.5 (19) | — | senior apartments |
| 11 | Majestic Ranch Apartments | 64 | 4 (165) | — | Residents who want reliable maintenance |
| 12 | Sunrise Townhomes | 64 | 4.1 (12) | — | affordable housing |
| 13 | Monticello Manor Apartment Homes | 62 | 3.5 (119) | — | affordable housing |
| 14 | Sunstone Apartments | 62 | 4 (55) | — | luxury apartments |
| 15 | La Risa Apartment Homes | 62 | 3.7 (184) | — | affordable housing |
| 16 | Hilltop Oaks Apartments | 60 | 3.5 (226) | — | affordable housing |
| 17 | The Crossing at 1415 | 58 | 3.7 (68) | — | affordable housing |
| 18 | The Ascent Apartments | 58 | 3.1 (159) | — | affordable housing |
| 19 | Aspire at Tampico | 58 | 3.6 (96) | — | luxury apartments |
| 20 | Big Rock | 58 | 3.5 (51) | — | furnished corporate |
| 21 | Liberty Ridge Apartments | 56 | 3.8 (30) | — | luxury apartments |
| 22 | Sunshine Plaza Apartments | 55 | 3.9 (16) | — | affordable housing |
| 23 | Aspire Apartments | 54 | 3 (206) | — | luxury apartments |
| 24 | Callaghan Heights Apartments | 54 | 4.1 (17) | — | pet friendly apartments |
| 25 | Avistar on the Hills | 53 | 3.1 (109) | — | luxury apartments |
| 26 | Cypress Cove | 53 | 3.2 (39) | — | affordable housing |
| 27 | Dakota Apartments | 53 | 3.3 (39) | — | affordable housing |
| 28 | Antonian Apartments & Twnhms | 52 | 3.5 (46) | — | affordable housing |
| 29 | Woodlawn Ranch Apartments | 50 | 3.1 (84) | — | affordable housing |
| 30 | Ingram Ranch Apartments | 49 | 2.3 (102) | — | affordable housing |
| 31 | Ingram Square Apartments | 47 | 2.8 (32) | — | affordable housing |
| 32 | Pecan Hill Apartments | 42 | 3.1 (27) | — | senior apartments |
| 33 | 903 Canterbury Rd | 41 | 3 (3) | — | pet friendly apartments |
| 34 | Green court | 33 | 3.8 (18) | — | furnished corporate |
| 35 | DeChantle Apartments | 26 | 2 (6) | — | furnished corporate |
Ranked picks

Regency Grove Apartments
score 75/100Staff respond quickly to maintenance requests and work orders.

Las Villas De Leon Apartments
score 72/100Maintenance moves fast on routine fixes and staff like Erica and Rudy get named praise, though water damage and structural complaints linger unresolved.

Bexar Creek Apartments
score 70/100Property manager Elizabeth has built real loyalty and calmed the community, but pest issues and a hard-to-reach office mean asking for a documented inspection first.

Mira Vista Ranch Apartment Homes
score 70/100Standouts like Jessica and Michael Estrada earn five-star loyalty while other reviewers report break-ins and package theft, so the experience splits sharply.

The Sorento Apartments
score 68/100Recent full renovations and staff like Willie and Santi impress some residents, but others can't get the office to answer calls at all.

Loma Vista Lofts
score 68/100Sandra's personal touch and an easy application process stand out, but recent reviews point to trash, pests, and a pool closed without updates.

The Gobi Apartments
score 67/100Stephanie Hernandez and Nancy Alvarez make leasing smooth for special circumstances, though longer stays surface mold and pest complaints.

Cabana Apartments
score 66/100Residents consistently report feeling at home quickly, with maintenance and staff becoming trusted community members.

Vivid Apartments
score 65/100Leasing agents Jovie, Chelsea, and Patty smooth out move-in and same-day maintenance from Jesse and Jesus keeps units in good shape.

Legacy at Science Park
score 65/100Residents consistently praise quick, professional maintenance response and staff who treat them as individuals.

Majestic Ranch Apartments
score 64/100Maintenance specialist Michael consistently fixes things fast and treats people well, even where office service is inconsistent.

Sunrise Townhomes
score 64/100Tenants consistently praise Jennifer and the office staff for making the leasing process straightforward and treating residents with respect even with credit challenges.

Monticello Manor Apartment Homes
score 62/100Staff members like Rosanna, Cheryl, and Brianna draw repeated praise for genuine care and problem-solving; new management has noticeably raised morale and responsiveness.

Sunstone Apartments
score 62/100Sunstone's leasing team, particularly Victoria and Ike, earn consistent praise for professionalism and patience during move-ins.

La Risa Apartment Homes
score 62/100Residents report clean, quiet apartments with working repair systems, but face significant frustration with air conditioning failures and uneven staff professionalism.

Hilltop Oaks Apartments
score 60/100Strong personal relationships with front-office staff (Monica, Judy, Veronica) and affordable rates draw residents in; many praise quick communication and move-in assistance.

The Crossing at 1415
score 58/100Recent management change has divided opinion sharply.

The Ascent Apartments
score 58/100The Ascent sharply divides: recent guests praise rapid move-ins and staff like Darlene, Gloria, and Steven who go above and beyond.

Aspire at Tampico
score 58/100Long-time residents appreciate the friendly staff, modern aesthetics, and proximity to downtown; some praise management events and the pet-friendly policy.

Big Rock
score 58/100Big Rock has transformed under new management over the past six months, earning strong praise for staff warmth and swift maintenance fixes.

Liberty Ridge Apartments
score 56/100Long-term residents praise Liberty Ridge for its peaceful setting and responsive staff, particularly Jennifer's customer service.

Sunshine Plaza Apartments
score 55/100Sunshine Plaza Apartments draws mixed responses.

Aspire Apartments
score 54/100Aspire (now branded Regency Grove) has a troubled maintenance record.

Callaghan Heights Apartments
score 54/100Sylvia, the apartment manager, earns consistent praise for flexibility with new tenants and fast approvals.

Avistar on the Hills
score 53/100Avistar attracts residents with competitive pricing and attractive grounds, but reviews split sharply over management conduct.

Cypress Cove
score 53/100Long-term residents praise the friendly office staff and newer maintenance team's responsiveness, but safety concerns dominate complaints: vehicle break-ins, package theft, and homeless activity on the property recur across years.

Dakota Apartments
score 53/100Dakota offers low rents and a staff that some tenants praise, but chronic pest issues, inconsistent maintenance, and noise enforcement failures cloud the experience.

Antonian Apartments & Twnhms
score 52/100Reviewers praise the on-site management team (especially Tammy) and spacious, well-kept apartments in a safe, gated setting.

Woodlawn Ranch Apartments
score 50/100Most residents describe neglected maintenance, pest problems, and mold issues that management ignores until city inspections force action.

Ingram Ranch Apartments
score 49/100Ingram Ranch struggles with pervasive pest and mold problems that residents say management ignores for months.

Ingram Square Apartments
score 47/100Ingram Square serves low-income families and provides clean units on quiet grounds, yet management neglect dominates reviews.

Pecan Hill Apartments
score 42/100Pecan Hill's rating is sharply divided: half five-star, half one or two-star reviews.

903 Canterbury Rd
score 41/100Very limited evidence: a 3-star average across three reviews shows a split between one five-star and two low-rated accounts.

Green court
score 33/100Half the reviews are five-star, but a serious flooding incident three years ago requiring Fire Department intervention marks a significant maintenance failure.

DeChantle Apartments
score 26/100Most recent reviews describe significant security and maintenance problems: nightly drug activity around the property, trash on stairs, vehicle break-ins, and poor paint work (outlets painted over).